Legal Opinion

Pealor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1983No. 65335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

In this appeal from his conviction for burglary, the defendant’s primary contention is that the trial court erred in failing to exclude from evidence certain pre-trial statements not provided to him prior to trial in accordance with the provisions of OCGA § 17-7-210 (Code Ann. § 27-1302). The defendant was indicted on August 7,1981, and arraigned on August 10th, at which time he informed the court of his intention to retain an attorney. Trial was set for August 24th. On August 12th, he informed the court that he had been unable to retain an attorney. The judge then informed him…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Blanchard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. State v. MemingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Ludy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Tyus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API