Legal Opinion

Dumke v. Southside Realty Investments, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 22, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00935Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANDREW B. DUMKE, Case No.: 20-cv-0935-GPC-LL 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 SOUTHSIDE REALTY INVESTMENTS, LLC 14 [Dkt. No. 25.] Defendant. 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. 17 (Dkt. No. 25.) Defendant filed an opposition and Plaintiff replied. (Dkt. Nos. 27, 29.) 18 Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an 19 amended complaint. 20 Background 21 On May…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API