Legal Opinion
Hotel Sherman, Inc. v. Harlow
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 14, 1960No. Civ. 187-59PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUNZEL, District Judge.
By this action, plaintiff, a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois, the owner of the Pump Room in Chicago, Illinois, seeks to enjoin defendants, citizens of California, from using the.name “Pump Room” in connection with the operation of a restaurant and cocktail bar in Los Angeles County. Plaintiff also demands general and punitive damages. Defendants, by counterclaim, seek to enjoin the plaintiff from using the name “Pump Room” in Los Angeles. County in connection with plaintiff’s proposed opening of a restaurant in Los Angeles…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Ambassador East, Inc. v. Orsatti, Inc., and Arnold OrsattiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Ambassador East, Inc. v. Shelton Corners, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Ambassador East, Inc. v. Orsatti, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Kasser Distillers Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Burger King of Florida, Inc., and Burger King Restaurants, Inc. v. Gene Hoots and Betty Hoots, D/B/A Burger KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Tustin Community Hospital, Inc. v. Santa Ana Community Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979