Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Barnard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 2007No. COA06-209Published

1DissentCalabria, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion that there was no error in the court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. A 30-second delay at a green light fails to provide the particularized suspicion required for an investigative stop, and I would therefore hold that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the crack discovered during the stop and the statements made following the stop. However, I would remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings to determine whether the crack rock seized from defendant following his participation in a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API