North Springs Water Co. v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thomas Carroll, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered hy
Reavis, J.
Bill in equity by the Worth Springs Water Company, a corporation, against the city of Tacoma, a municipal corporation, to enjoin the city from extending its water system in that part of the city of Tacoma situated in sections 24 and 25, and in what is known as “Old Tacoma” and where the plaintiff owns a plant and has its mains and pipes, and is supplying water to the inhabitants, or most of them, of the area designated. The facts are substantially as folloivs; Plaintiff (here appellant) is the owner of certain springs of fresh water in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Painter v. PainterOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- Curtis v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- State ex rel. Corry v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.