Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Pimentel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2004No. ED 83468PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, Chief Judge.

Howard Ransom (Appellant) filed suit against Dr. Esperanza Pimentel (Respondent) for medical malpractice. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss asserting that Appellant had failed td state a claim for medical malpractice. The trial court granted Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissed Appellant’s petition without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This appeal ensued. Because the trial court’s order is not denominated a judgment as required by Rule 74.01(a), 1 we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

An aggrieved party may only appeal from a final…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Jon E. Fuhrer Co. v. GerhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Bryant v. City of University CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Peet v. RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodson v. National Sports & Recreation, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Hampton v. King Royal Bros. CircusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Smith v. GarvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API