Ransom v. Pimentel
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, Chief Judge.
Howard Ransom (Appellant) filed suit against Dr. Esperanza Pimentel (Respondent) for medical malpractice. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss asserting that Appellant had failed td state a claim for medical malpractice. The trial court granted Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissed Appellant’s petition without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This appeal ensued. Because the trial court’s order is not denominated a judgment as required by Rule 74.01(a), 1 we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
An aggrieved party may only appeal from a final…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Jon E. Fuhrer Co. v. GerhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bryant v. City of University CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Peet v. RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodson v. National Sports & Recreation, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hampton v. King Royal Bros. CircusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smith v. GarvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004