Legal Opinion
Miller v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided June 24, 1999No. 98-2290 D/VPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the court is the April 2, 1999, motion for summary judgment on behalf of Defendant, Federal Express. Defendant filed the instant motion asserting three primary arguments. First, Plaintiff, Mary Miller’s, claim of sex discrimination is beyond the scope of her charge of discrimination. 1 Second, Plaintiff failed to state a prima facie case of race discrimination and in the event that she did state a prima facie case, Defendant had a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for terminating…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lawrence E. Anthony, Jr. v. Btr Automotive Sealing Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Madhat Zubi v. At&t CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Svc. Professionals v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Campbell v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Derrickson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.