Frank v. Dana Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
*172ORDER
CARR, Chief Judge.
This is a securities case. Multiple plaintiffs have brought suit against Dana Corporation and some of its corporate officers alleging the company misstated its earnings, artificially inflating the value of its stock, in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a). Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Pending is the Pension Trust Fund Group’s (PTFG) motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Order appointing the City of Philadelphia lead plaintiff. For the following reasons, that motion will be granted.
Procedural Background
PTFG and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Cardinal Health, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Miller v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- In Re Comdisco Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Sherwood v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Credit Suisse-AOL Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- In re Bausch & Lomb Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007