Legal Opinion

Frank v. Dana Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 24, 2006No. Nos. 3:05cv7393, 3:05cv7406, 3:05cv7417PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*172ORDER

CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a securities case. Multiple plaintiffs have brought suit against Dana Corporation and some of its corporate officers alleging the company misstated its earnings, artificially inflating the value of its stock, in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a). Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Pending is the Pension Trust Fund Group’s (PTFG) motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Order appointing the City of Philadelphia lead plaintiff. For the following reasons, that motion will be granted.

Procedural Background

PTFG and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Cardinal Health, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. In Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  3. Miller v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
  4. In Re Comdisco Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. Sherwood v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Credit Suisse-AOL Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  2. In re Bausch & Lomb Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API