Legal Opinion

Bachick v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 14, 2000No. 2-98-392-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

SAM J. DAY, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Randy John Bachick entered an open plea of guilty to the offense of driving while intoxicated after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. The trial court assessed punishment at 90 days’ confinement, probated for two years, and a $450 fine.

On original submission, Appellant argued in two points that the trial court erred in not suppressing evidence obtained after he was stopped for a traffic violation. We affirmed the trial court’s judgment after concluding that Appellant’s contentions were waived under the Helms rule. 1 The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Gearing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Rubeck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Brother v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. McCraw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. State v. Purdy, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API