State v. Becker
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Des Moines Distñct Cozirt. •Liquor act : requisites of indictment : evidence. — For necessary statement see opinion. Defendant was convicted, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.
The defendant was indicted under the eighth section of the prohibitory liquor law, being section 1564 of the Revision.
i. ixmertmdoátin? liquors: dupiicity. Decided : First. That an indictment, under said section, which charges that in a certain building the defendant kept intoxicating liquors for sale, and did then and-there sell the same, does not charge two dis-3 tinct offenses, and is not bad for duplicity.
z. — name cimera, Second. It is not necessary to set Out in the indictment the names of the persons to whom the liquor was sold.
3. __ aebuilding, Third. That, as the proceeding under…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. BodeckarWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. KoernerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Blair v. ComptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.