Legal Opinion
Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. Jorling
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1992No. CV 91-2789PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND JUDGMENT
JACK B. WEINSTEIN, District Judge:
By authority of New York’s complex of environmental statutes and rules, plaintiffs, regarded by the state as persistent polluters, have been put out of the business of transporting petroleum and petroleum products on New York’s waterways. Claiming violation of their federal rights, they seek damages and permission to restart their business. For the reasons indicated below, the case must be dismissed. Plaintiffs are left to pursue remedies in state court.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff Standard Marine Services, Inc. is a Delaware corporation…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. JorlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. JorlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.