Legal Opinion

Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. Jorling

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 24, 1993No. 443, Docket 92-7680PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jack B. Weinstein, Judge, that dismissed them amended complaint, which challenged summary abatement orders issued by defendants under New York Environmental Conservation Law § 71-0301. Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. Jorling, 793 F.Supp. 408 (E.D.N.Y.1992). The orders prohibited plaintiffs from operating some of their oil and sludge barges in New York Harbor. The district court dismissed the complaint on multiple grounds. We affirm, on grounds of qualified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Inc. v. CurreyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  2. HBP ASSOCIATES v. MarshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. JorlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Larsen v. SENATE OF THE COM. OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Jemzura v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API