Bannon v. Auger
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The declaration as amended is in three counts. The first and second allege in substance that the defendant, without probable cause and with intent to injure the plaintiff, “did make, advise, aid and direct” a criminal complaint in the Third District Court of Bristol to be made charging him with larceny, and that thereafter the complaint was dismissed by the judge of that court and the plaintiff was discharged. The third count alleges that the defendant maliciously and without probable cause “procured, advised, aided and abetted in having a criminal prosecution instituted against the plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norris v. DoniphanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
- Langford v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Cardival v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Commonwealth v. BressantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Britton v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Kennedy v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Rosenblum v. GinisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Muniz v. MehlmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.