Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harold E. Bledsoe v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 14, 1972No. 72-1052Published

1DissentSprecher, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Section 223(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1), provides for disability insurance for every person who (1) is insured for disability insurance benefits, (2) has not attained the age of 65, (3) has filed application for disability insurance benefits, and (4) is under a disability.

The appellant here, Harold E. Bledsoe, fulfilled the first three requirements and had the burden of proving that he was under a disability, defined as “inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carl G. Underwood, (Social Security Account Number Tqv-Im-Bnsb v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Thomas E. Depaepe, Sr. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary, Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Clyde Dillon v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  4. George E. Polly v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  5. Cecil Rowe, on Behalf of Dewanna S. Rowe, Infant v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API