Legal Opinion

Joseph v. City of Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1936No. 8311PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice,

Appellant Edward Joseph sued appellees, the City of Austin and its city manager, Adam Johnson, for damages alleged to have been caused by the summary removal of a stucco wall constructed by appellant on a portion of Split Rock avenue, a public street of said city. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial court instructed a verdict and accordingly rendered judgment for appel-lees; hence this appeal.

Appellant owned lot 3, block 1, in Edge-mont addition to the City of Austin, abutting on Split Rock avenue, a public street of said city, which had been dedicated by map and plat…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wolf v. BrassTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Smith Ex Rel. Cushing v. Corporation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  5. City of Pontiac v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re MHI Partnership, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  3. Aransas County v. ReifCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Town of Palm Valley v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  5. Walker v. Texas Electric Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API