Legal Opinion

Heusel v. Multnomah County District Attorney's Office

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1999No. 9703-01834; CA A101622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s allowance of a directed verdict against his claims for false imprisonment and negligence. The court concluded that defendant Multnomah County District Attorney’s office was absolutely immune from those claims. We affirm.

The material facts, as set out in the parties’ stipulated facts and associated exhibits, are straightforward. In December 1993, plaintiffs former girlfriend, Bemardi, obtained a Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) restraining order against defendant. ORS 107.700 et seq. On February 1, 1994, the circuit court, upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kalina v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Shaw v. MoonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Utley v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Gibson v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  3. Gibson v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API