Legal Opinion

United States v. Conley

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1993No. Crim. 91-178PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEE, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendant William E. Rusin’s Motion to Quash County Twenty-Six of Indictment for Violation of Rule 8(a), Fed.R.Crim.P. (Document No. 364).

On September 20, 1991, a Grand Jury indicted Defendant William E. Rusin (“Rusin”) and twenty-two others in a twenty-nine count indictment.

Count One charges all Defendants with a dual-object conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The objects of the conspiracy are alleged to be, first, taking part in an illegal gambling business involving video poker machines in violation of Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. James T. Moloney, AKA James Maloney, AKA Jim MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Teresa PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. GordonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API