Legal Opinion

Bell v. Swim

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1915No. 783. [fn†]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

The appellant, H. A. Bell, is the father of P. C. Bell, deceased, and the note creating the controversy between appellant and appellee was executed by the deceased, P. C. Bell, in favor of Swim, for the consideration of certain mules sold by the latter to said P. C. Bell. During the pend-ency of this obligation of P. C. Bell to Swim, the former transferred to his father, H. A. Bell, on January 28, 1909, all of his real estate, and practically all of his personal property, as an assignment, for the purpose of paying his debts. Prior to this assignment of P. C. Bell to H. A. Bell, for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Du BoseTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cathey v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sullivan v. FantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Babcock v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  5. Gibbons v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PGP Gas Products, Inc. v. Reserve Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Utilities Natural Gas Corp. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Southland Life Ins. v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Bell v. SwimTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Brooke Smith Realty Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API