Legal Opinion

Oregon Tunnel District No. 1 v. Moore

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAND, J. —

This is an appeal from a decree holding that Chapter 319, Laws of 1921, an act providing for the formation of tunnel districts, contravenes Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and Section 20 of Article I of the state Constitution, rendering the act unconstitutional and void.

The act provides, that upon the petition of fifty, or a majority of the owners of land within a proposed tunnel district, if compliance has been had with certain other provisions of the act, an election shall be held to determine whether the proposed district shall be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. United States Automobile Service Club v. Van WinkleOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wasson v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Gaston v. Cooperative Farm Chemicals Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API