Legal Opinion
Suggs v. M & T Bank
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 18, 2017No. Civil Case No. 3:15-cv-00396-JAGPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge
Mary Jane Suggs lost her home to foreclosure in June 2013. To avoid eviction, she sued in state court with the help of a lawyer, and then sued in this Court with the help of the internet. Through her downloaded complaint, Suggs asserts ten causes of action against three defendants. Two defendants escaped the case because Suggs did not serve them as required by the applicable rales. The remaining defendant, M & T Bank (“M & T”), has moved to dismiss the ease. Because her complaint contains few facts, many legal conclusions, and misguided…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- AB Staffing Solutions, LLC v. ACI Federal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Aalaam v. Movement Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Bey v. MichaelDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- Desmond Cunningham v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2026
- Echeverria v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.