Legal Opinion

Bails v. BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 11, 2006No. 04 C 4649Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HART, District Judge.

Plaintiff Patrick Bails complains that defendant United Airlines Employees Welfare Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) denied medical benefits for two of his children. 1 Also named as a defendant is Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois which provides administrative services for the Plan, including claims administration. Both sides have moved for summary judgment.

It is undisputed that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., applies to the Plan and that the Plan provides that the Plan Administrator has…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Susan E. Hess v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Hackett v. Xerox Corp. Long-Term Disability Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Cozzie v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. James Hess & John Hess v. Reg-Ellen MacHine Tool Corp. And Reg Ellen MacHine Tool Corp. Employee Stock Ownership PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API