Hackett v. Xerox Corp. Long-Term Disability Income Plan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
James Hackett claims that the defendants (collectively “Xerox”), who are responsible for administering Xerox’s Long-Term Disability Plan (“the Plan”), violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., when they terminated his long-term disability benefits. The district court denied Hackett’s motion for summary judgment and granted Xerox’s motion for summary judgment. Hackett appeals. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse and remand to the district court.
I. Background
James Hackett has worked for Xerox since 1985. Hackett began to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Carolyn Herzberger v. Standard Insurance Company, Beverly A. Johnson v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Penny Grosz-Salomon v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, a Provident Company Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Frank M. Rosetto, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons v. Pabst Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Miller v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Holmstrom v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Edwards v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- James Mcdonald v. Western-Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Alton Robinson v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.