Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lloyd

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1916PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a suit in equity whereby the plaintiff, who is an attorney at law, seeks to establish a debt against the principal defendant for services rendered and to reach and apply in payment thereof property of the principal defendant in the hands of the other defendants. An interlocutory decree was entered sending the case to a master “to find the facts and to report the same to the court.” An elaborate and comprehensive report has been made covering the issues raised by the pleadings in conformity to this decree. It contains no report of the evidence. On the coming in of the master’s report…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Parker v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Cook v. ScheffreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Warfield v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. New York Bank Note Co. v. Kidder Press Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Morin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Farnham v. Lenox Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API