United States Trustee v. Rahmi (In re Rahmi)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Patrick M. Flatley, United States Bankruptcy Judge.
The United States Trustee (“UST”) seeks summary judgment on Count III and Count X of her ten-count complaint to deny Alex Rahmi (the “Debtor”) a discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(B). The Debtor, in essence, does not contest the allegations of the UST’s complaint or motion for summary judgment but, rather, blames the UST for his alleged misconduct.1
For the reasons stated herein, the court will grant summary judgment to the UST on Count III of her complaint.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Eddie Williams v. J.H. Griffin, Superintendent J.C. Harris, Jr., Area Administrator Aaron J. Johnson, Secretary of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quality Car & Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Adkins (In re Adkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2017
- Miller v. Young (In re Young)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Alex Rahmi v. Pill & Pill, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
- Fitzgerald, III v. TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2022
- In Re: Money Centers of America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020