Legal Opinion

Nunnally v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 19, 1977No. 1 CA-CIV 3207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

This appeal concerns the revocation of a liquor license by the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control. The facts reveal that in 1972 June Mondhink sold certain premises known as “Guys and Dolls” along with a series 6 spiritous liquor license to Inez Nunnally. As security for the purchase price, Mondhink filed a restriction on the liquor license with the Department. The restriction was on a form supplied by the Depart*509ment and provided that if Nunnally should violate her agreement with Mondhink or violate any law regarding her license, that the Department was authorized by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hooper v. DuncanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Arizona State Liquor Board v. PoulosArizona Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flowers v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Baird v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Mathis v. Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Flowers v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API