Benedict v. Snead
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Presiding Judge.
At issue is whether the trial court properly dismissed an amendment to a complaint on the basis of res judicata. Because we find that final judgment had been entered on the original complaint, and the amendment attempted to relitigate a claim between the parties concerning the same subject matter which could have been litigated as part of the original complaint, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal.
*750Samuel Benedict entered into a contract to buy real property from James and Cheryl Snead. When the Sneads refused to sell citing Benedict’s failure to close by the date…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Labovitz v. HopkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. Smith & Jenkins, P. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Clayton v. DeverellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Haith v. Model Cities Health Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hardwick v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- LAYMAC v. KUSHNER Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- DOUGLAS WILLIAMS v. CASTLE HOME PRO, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023