Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Snead

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 2002No. A01A1832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

At issue is whether the trial court properly dismissed an amendment to a complaint on the basis of res judicata. Because we find that final judgment had been entered on the original complaint, and the amendment attempted to relitigate a claim between the parties concerning the same subject matter which could have been litigated as part of the original complaint, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal.

*750Samuel Benedict entered into a contract to buy real property from James and Cheryl Snead. When the Sneads refused to sell citing Benedict’s failure to close by the date…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Labovitz v. HopkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. Smith & Jenkins, P. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Clayton v. DeverellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Haith v. Model Cities Health Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Hardwick v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. LAYMAC v. KUSHNER Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. DOUGLAS WILLIAMS v. CASTLE HOME PRO, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API