Worcester Reg'l Ret. Bd. v. Contributory Ret. Appeal Bd.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Worcester Regional Retirement Board (WRRB) appeals from a Superior Court judgment affirming a decision of the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (CRAB). See G. L. c. 30A, § 14 (7). WRRB claims error in CRAB's interpretation of G. L. c. 32. We affirm.
1. Standard of review. "Courts must ascertain the intent of a statute from all its parts and from the subject matter to which it relates, and courts must interpret the statute so as to render the legislation effective, consonant with reason and common sense." Rotondi v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 463 Mass. 644, 648 (2012), quoting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cote-Whitacre v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Catlin v. Board of Registration of ArchitectsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Rotondi v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Retirement Board of Stoneham v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Arlington Contributory Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.