Clark v. White
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE L5 — APPLICATION FOR FERRY PRIVILEGES APPEAL FROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Rev. Slat.,'secs. 1, 4, 5, 8, 1 Stanton, 538. Civil Code, secs. 20, 21, 32, 13. 5 Dana, 100; Churchill vs. Grundy. 1 Bibb, 495; A J. J. Marshall, 539. 3 Marshall, 321; Gibbons vs. Pollard. CITED— 5 Dana, 101; Churchill vs. Grundy. 3 J. J. Mar., 669 ; Lytle vs. Breckinridge. 1 Duvall, 139; R. and L. T. Road Co. vs. Rogers. 1 Bibb, 495; Lawless vs. Rees.
Read the full summary
CASE L5 — APPLICATION FOR FERRY PRIVILEGES APPEAL FROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Rev. Slat.,'secs. 1, 4, 5, 8, 1 Stanton, 538. Civil Code, secs. 20, 21, 32, 13. 5 Dana, 100; Churchill vs. Grundy. 1 Bibb, 495; A J. J. Marshall, 539. 3 Marshall, 321; Gibbons vs. Pollard. CITED— 5 Dana, 101; Churchill vs. Grundy. 3 J. J. Mar., 669 ; Lytle vs. Breckinridge. 1 Duvall, 139; R. and L. T. Road Co. vs. Rogers. 1 Bibb, 495; Lawless vs. Rees. Rev. Stat., sec. 16, “ Ferries,” 1 Slant., 542. 16 B. Mon., 699; Newport vs. Taylor.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion oe the court:
This controversy arises out of an application by William J. Clark to the Estill county court, at its January term, 1867, for the privilege of keeping a ferry in said county, on the Kentucky river, from the north to the south bank thereof, where the Irvine and Richmond Turnpike Road c2’osses said river; claiming to be entitled to said privilege on the ground that he is the owner, proprietor, and is in possession of the land on the noi'th side of said liver whei’e said tturnpike 2’oad crosses it, and also above and below said crossing, and because…
2Cited by3 opinions
- McCrary v. HarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Valdés y Cobián v. GrahameDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1908
- Walker v. TrailCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934