Legal Opinion

Combast v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 4, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 61. — PROSECUTION AGAINST AARON COMBAST FOR VIOLATING THE LOCAL OPTION LAW. — Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court. B. J. Bethurum, Circuit Judge. Defendant convicted and appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner.

— Affirming.

Appellant, Aaron Combast,.was indicted by the grand jury of Pulaski county for the violation of section 2558a, Ky. St., which is a part of the local option law. His demurrer to the indictment was overruled. He was then placed on trial. The jury found him guilty, and fixed his punishment at a fine of $100. Prom the judgment of conviction he prosecutes this appeal.

The indictment is as follows: 1 ‘ The grand jury of Pulaski county, in the name and by the authority of the commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse Aaron Com-bast of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  2. Belleview Loan & Building Ass'n v. JeckelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Commonwealth v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Gambill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API