Higgins v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourteenth Judicial District, Placer County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, J.
In the years 1858 and 1859, the Bear River and Auburn Water and Mining Company—a corporation—became indebted to the plaintiff as trustee for certain owners and holders of bonds issued by the company, amounting, in the aggregate, to the sum of thirty thousand dollars. These bonds were made and issued by the company at different times during the years mentioned. Each of the bonds was in the sum of five hundred dollars. These bonds were drawn and made payable as follows : One third in twelve months, one third in eighteen months, and one third in twenty-four months from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sayre v. WisnerNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Sanford v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Palmer v. Conly & JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Berley v. RampacherThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Lick v. FaulknerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Burg Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Gryff v. RohrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- In re Estate of SutroCalifornia Superior Court · 1912
- McKeown v. BeattyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Rosenblatt v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.