Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ramey

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 29, 1994No. Record No. 1043-94-3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARROW, J.

In this appeal we conclude that Code § 19.2-398, which provides the Commonwealth a limited right to appeal interlocutory orders, does not violate the United States constitutional guarantee of equal protection. In addition, we hold that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, does not support the trial court’s finding that a police officer lacked justification in seizing a plastic bottle possessed by the defendant.

While issuing a traffic summons to the driver of an automobile in which the defendant was a passenger, the police officer saw a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Carson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Smyth v. GodwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Novak v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  3. Upchurch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  4. Grandison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  5. Robert Lee McLaughlin, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API