Grandison v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENTS, Judge.
Tony Donnell Grandison (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of possession of cocaine, in violation of Code § 18.2-250. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, arguing that the cocaine was not legally obtained by the police under the plain view doctrine. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment and appellant’s conviction.
I. BACKGROUND
On appeal of a denial of a motion to suppress, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth and grant to the Commonwealth all reasonable inferences…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GrimsteadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Harris v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grandison v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Snell v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008