Legal Opinion
New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 2013No. 2013-CA-0873PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.
_|jThe City of New Orleans (the “City”) and its co-defendants seek review of the district court’s grant of a writ of mandamus directing the City to “immediately budget, appropriate for and pay to the New Orleans Fire Fighters [sic] Pension & Relief Fund ... the sum of $17,524,329 as the Actuarially Required Contribution to *414the ‘New System’ administered by the Fund.”1
The City raises several issues on appeal, the most significant of which is whether mandamus is the proper procedure for the enforcement of a statutory provision regarding the funding of the New Orleans…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Fink v. BryantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Hoag v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Unwired Telecom v. Parish of CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Felix v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Cunningham v. MarulloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Rory Anthony Miller and Jessica Eustis Miller v. Acadian Ambulance Service of New Orleans, L.L.C. and Xyz Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.