Legal Opinion

DiDonato v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1969No. Appeal, No. 398PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

■ The legal question presented in this appeal arises in the context of a somewhat cumbersome fact situation. Qn August 1, 1965, the Reliance Standard Life insurance Company (hereinafter Reliance) entered into an Agreement of Sale with Anthony and Viola DiDonato (hereinafter appellants). Under the terms of the contract, Reliance agreed to sell to the appellants for |16,000 the premises located at 1015-23 South 3rd Street, Philadelphia. Reliance executed a certification in compliance with the Act of July 27, 1955, P. L. 288, as amended, 21 P.S. 613.1, stating that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Spratt v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Rappaport v. SavitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Byrne v. KanigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Mohave County v. Mohave-Kingman Estates, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Barak, G. v. Karolizki, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. The DOVER POOL & RACQUET CLUB, INC. v. BrookingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Rusiski v. Pribonic (In Re Pribonic)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API