Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action inter alia to declare that plaintiffs are entitled to a right of way over a certain roadway, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 11, 1975, as, inter alia, (1) declared that plaintiffs have an easement for ingress and egress over the subject roadway and (2) enjoined defendant from maintaining obstructions thereon and plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of the same judgment as (1) limited the extent of their ingress and egress over the subject roadway to less than its full width as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Vil. of Olean v. . SteynerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Fiebelkorn v. RogackiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Fiebelkorn v. RogackiNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Powlowski v. Mohawk Golf ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. O'Hara v. WallaceNew York Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Fischer v. LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Rice v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. 487 Elmwood, Inc. v. HassettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Guardino v. ColangeloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API