Legal Opinion
United States v. Nikolay Senchenko
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1998No. 96-30241PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge:
Senchenko was charged in a one-count indictment with violation of 16 U.S.C. §§ 3372(a)(1) and 3373(d)(1)(B) for having “knowingly engage[d] in conduct involving an intent to sell wildlife with a market value in excess of $350, ... by transporting said wildlife knowing it was taken in violation of United States law or regulation.” The jury found Senchenko guilty and the district court denied his motion for acquittal. We have jurisdiction of his appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FACTS
During the two year period alleged in the indictment, between…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Leslie Fleishman, United States of America v. Peter Combs, United States of America v. Stephen GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Abromson v. American Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Patrick HintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Richard Wesley ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Fred Fuchs and Roy D. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Salvador Martinez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Cree v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.