Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1958No. 19932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The defendant strongly insists that the court erred in overruling the general grounds of his motion for new trial. We have set out a rather full statement of the circumstantial evidence on which the State relies to sustain the verdict.

The evidence in the present case is insufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis except the guilt of the accused. There is no evidence to connect the defendant with the strangulation of his wife; there are only unexplained and suspicious circumstances, and these are not sufficient to convict a person of murder. Young v. State, 121 Ga.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Montos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Fountain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Redwine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Hoyle Lamont Peacock, Vera Lee Peacock and Harvey Coleman PeacockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. MacH v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Muckle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API