Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1950No. 16981PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Where evidence is admissible to show motive and to connect the accused with the crime charged, the mere fact that it may tend incidentally to put the character of the accused in issue would not render it inadmissible. Wilson v. State, 150 Ga. 285 (2) (103 S. E. 682); Cooper v. State, 182 Ga. 42, 51 (184 S. E. 716, 104 A.L.R. 1309); Williams v. State, 152 Ga. 498 (110 S. E. 286); Frank v. State, 141 Ga. 243 (80 S. E. 1016); Hill v. State, 148 Ga. 521 (97 S. E. 442). But it is error to allow, over objection of the defendant, prejudicial and irrelevant matter to go…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Bowden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Hartley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Castleberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API