Legal Opinion

Aguirre-Mata v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1999No. 0762-98PublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLAND, J.,

delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.

Following a plea of guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, a jury assessed appellant’s punishment at ninety-nine years’confinement and a $250,000 fine. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.1121. The First Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case finding the trial court’s failure to admonish appellant of the range of punishment for which he was on trial amounted to harm under Rule 44.2(a). Aguirre-Mata v. State, 962 S.W.2d 264 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist] 1998). We granted the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. Aguirre-Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Davison, Anthony RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. Schmutz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API