Legal Opinion
Aguirre-Mata v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 14, 2003No. 2115-00PublishedCited by 199 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
This case is here on discretionary review a second time. Previously, this Court unanimously held that a trial court’s error in failing to show on the record that it admonished a guilty-pleading defendant on the range of punishment is nonconstitu-tional error, subject to the harm analysis under Rule 44.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Aguirre-Mata v. State, 992 S.W.2d 495, 499 (Tex.Cr.App.1999) (admonishments embodied in Article 26.13(a), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, are not constitutionally…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by199 opinions
- Davison, Anthony RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Fakeye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.