Toms v. Unemp. Comp. Review Comm., 2007 Ca 80 (8-29-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant Anthony R. Toms appeals from the judgment of the Clark County Common Pleas Court affirming the decision of the Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission, disallowing his request for a review of the hearing officer's decision finding that Toms did not work the requisite number of weeks and did not ear0sufficient wages to qualify for unemployment compensation benefits.

{¶ 2} Toms sets forth four rambling assignments of error that are largely irrelevant and unintelligible and that fail to challenge any specific rulings or procedural matters below. Because we find the…