Legal Opinion

Del Rojas v. Lindsay Manufacturing Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1985No. 15244PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

Pedro Del Rojas, Sr., had brought an action for personal injuries against Lindsay alleging that the company was liable for injuries sustained by his son, Pedro Rojas, Jr., when the son became entangled in an unguarded drive-shaft of a Zimmatic Center Pivot Irrigation System (hereinafter *591“the irrigation system”) manufactured by Lindsay.

Rojas argues that the trial court erred in giving certain instructions, by improperly commenting on evidence, by permitting improper comment by Lindsay’s counsel, and by failing to admit certain evidence. He also contends that the jury’s verdict…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Max Rouse & Sons NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Annau v. SchutteIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kroetch v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Johnson v. EmersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API