Aronoff Galleries, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cline, Judge:
In this suit against the United States, the plaintiff claims that the collector of customs at the port of Baltimore assessed duty illegally on merchandise entered free of duty as artistic antiquities under paragraph 1811 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The invoice contains but one item, described as “1 Georgian mahogany dining table made in England previous to 1820. Purchased by us from Mr. C. W. Little of London, England in October 1935.”
The collector of customs classified the article as “wood furniture” and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Defiance Water Co. v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Gibbes v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- New Orleans v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981