Lamanna v. Vognar
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBERTSON, P. J.
Appellant challenges the judgment rendered against
her in an unlawful detainer proceeding.
*Supp. 6The main thrust of appellant’s appeal is that the evidence does not support the conclusion that appellant was guilty of unlawful detainer on the date the complaint was filed because the complaint was filed prematurely. Appellant’s contention in this regard is meritorious and requires a reversal; consequently, we do not reach the remaining contention.
Discussion
The Legislature has authorized a landlord or his or her successor in interest to utilize the statutory unlawful…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kwok v. BergrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Briggs v. Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Scoville v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Downing v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Ystrom v. HandelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gans v. SmullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hsieh v. PedersonCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
- Hsieh v. PedersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018