Legal Opinion

State v. Wittsell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 18, 2003No. 87,107PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

During the trial of Clyde Wittsell on one count of aggravated incest, a State’s witness violated an order in limine by stating that there had been a polygraph examination. The district court made an immediate sua sponte declaration of mistrial. Im puting the introduction of improper evidence to the prosecution, the district court denied retrial and dismissed the complaint on double jeopardy grounds. The State appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Wittsell, 30 Kan. App. 2d 1083, 53 P.3d 1248 (2002).

The sole issue is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. Santos-VegaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. Nathan Brock v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. Ex Parte WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API