Legal Opinion

Charles B. Splunge v. Dick Clark and Indiana Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 5, 1992No. 91-1499PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

During jury selection in Vanderburgh County, Indiana, Superior Court, in petitioner Charles Splunge’s trial for murder and robbery, the prosecutor used two of his peremptory challenges to exclude the only two black venire members from the petit jury. Splunge, who is also black, moved to discharge the jury before it was sworn on the basis that the prosecutor had purposefully excluded black potential jurors in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The trial judge gave the prosecutor an opportunity to respond. Then he denied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Avery v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. McKinley Dudley v. Jack Duckworth, Warden, and Indiana Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. JuniorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. United States v. Marius CanoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. State v. SparksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  4. Jerry Mahaffey v. Thomas Page, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. People v. HoganColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API