Legal Opinion

In re T.R.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 2008No. 2008-0401PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

I

{¶ 1} The Second District Court of Appeals has certified this case pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution and App.R. 25. The court of appeals found its judgment to be in conflict with the judgments of the Fifth District Court of Appeals in In re McCutchen (Mar. 8, 1991), Knox App. No. 90-CA-25, 1991 WL 34881, and the Twelfth District Court of Appeals in In re Cavender (Mar. 19, 2001), Madison App. No. CA2000-06-37, 2001 WL 277245, on the following issue: “Does R.C. 2151.413(E) require a children services board to file an adoption plan with the court, prior to the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. O'Toole v. DenihanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Amoco Oil Co. v. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Polus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. MedCorp, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re A.M. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In re A.M. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API