Legal Opinion

Moskowitz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2017No. 2015-0313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant, Marvin Moskowitz, after successfully obtaining from appellee Cuyahoga County Board of Revision (“BOR”) a property-value reduction for tax year 2012 from $148,800 to $60,000, appealed to the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”), seeking a further reduction to $25,000. The BTA upheld the BOR’s value, and on appeal to this court, Moskowitz contends that the record contains insufficient support for the BOR’s value and clearly negates the Cuyahoga County fiscal officer’s original assessment. On this basis, he urges us to accept his own opinion of value, $25,000. Because we find that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. EOP-BP Tower, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Amsdell v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Zindle v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schutz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Morton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Jakobovitch v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Mann v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Gallick v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API