State v. Snowden
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendants were represented by separate counsel at trial and they have filed separate briefs. Defendant Snowden’s 12 assignments of error are identical to 12 of defendant Boggs’ 14 assignments of error and, as their arguments are also identical, we will address these assignments jointly.
Defendants’ first assignments of error concern the admissibility, over their objections, of the in-court testimony of Sandra K. Williams. The defendants argue that this testimony was tainted by an out-of-court identification procedure conducted in an impermissibly suggestive manner.
It is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983