Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Kochenberger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 19, 1948No. 15,825PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILO J. FLANDERS, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, instituted a derivative action against Austin G. Kochenberger as clerk and recorder of Pueblo county and the Board of County Commissioners of the county to compel Kochenberger to account to the board for fees, perquisites, commissions and emoluments of his office and for judgment for the amount found to be due; for the removal of Kochenberger from office, and other relief. Upon trial to the court, defendants' motion for summary judgment was granted, and the action dismissed at plaintiff's costs.

In his amended complaint plaintiff alleged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Hatfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Walters v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. El Paso County v. SheldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morlan v. Durland Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  2. Primock v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Dominguez Reservoir Corp. v. FeilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Credit Investment & Loan Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Tamblyn v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API